A good while ago, we posted a blog about a grad student named Joel Tenenbaum, who was being charged a $675,000 fine for illegally downloading and sharing 31 songs on the internet. Months ago his lawyers were in the process of appealing that ruling on the grounds of a previous judge’s less severe ruling. But, the Supreme Court has just denied his appeal- meaning he will owe the full fine. While many anti-piracy groups claim that they aren’t after “joe-shmoe”, this trial proves that those who steal music will pay. And it will cost them a lot more than if they had just paid $.99 for the track in the first place.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
Categories
- Advertising
- Apple
- Ascap
- Background Music
- Bmi
- Buyout Music
- copyright
- Design
- education
- Film
- free royalty free music
- independent film
- Intellectual Property
- Internet
- iphone
- iTunes
- Music
- music library
- Music Licensing
- Music Loops
- Popular Music
- Powerpoint
- Production Music
- Radio
- Royalty Free Footage
- Royalty Free Graphics
- royalty free music
- Royalty Free Photos
- Social Media
- Sound Effects
- stock footage
- Stock Music
- Stock Photos
- Television
- Uncategorized
- Video
- Video Games
- Youtube
Meta


